Regarding school children’s reciting of the U.S. Pledge, last month’s Luster blog post by Leyden Marks spurred one Bright to devise an extensive response.
In it, Kevin (California, USA) describes how his personal activism achieved some substantive changes across his children’s school district and within their elementary school, advising: “Every one of us with a child in school can do this.”
Example: “I worked with the principal to have this explicit instruction used: ‘It’s time for the Pledge of Allegiance. If you choose to say the Pledge, please stand. If you choose not to say the Pledge, please stand or remain seated, quietly.’”
In addition to the recommendations for change, Kevin offers his list of sixteen(!) “reasons to have the Pledge of Allegiance removed from public schools.” They are in addition to the feature that so bugged Marks in his post: the superficiality and hollowness in the ritualistic declaration.
“This incessant ‘pledging of loyalty to the nation’ is teaching students that it’s acceptable, even expected, that you don’t really need to mean what you say!… As a promise, it’s shallow and hollow, not heartfelt and sincere. It isn’t really an honest, grave, pledge of loyalty, anyway.”